NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dalvand -v- Woollahra Municipal Council [2016] NSWLEC 1221 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 26 May 2016 Date of orders: 03 June 2016 Decision date: 03 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Morris C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ellie Dalvand (Applicant) Woollahra Municipal Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr R O'Gorman Hughes (Applicant)
Solicitors: Mr V Conomos, Conomos Legal (Applicant) Mr P Rigg (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/151561 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement are: 1. The Applicant is given leave to amend the development application and rely upon the following plans in the proceedings: 1. Drawing 02 Revision B dated May 2016 2. Drawing 03 Revision B dated May 2016 3. Drawing 04 Revision B dated May 2016 4. Drawing 05 Revision B dated May 2016 5. Drawing 11 Revision A dated January 2016 1. For the purpose of s97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the parties agree the amendments are minor. 2. The appeal is upheld. 1. Development application DA12/2016/1 lodged 20 January 2016 seeking approval for the demolition of the existing structure and construction of a three storey dwelling house is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A. ……………. Commissioner Morris 151561.16 Morris (C) (584 KB, pdf) 151561.16 Morris_02B (699 KB, pdf) 151561.16 Morris_03B (496 KB, pdf) 151561.16 Morris_04B (2.22 MB, pdf) 151561.16 Morris_05B (1.23 MB, pdf) 151561.16 Morris_11 Basix_Dwg 11_Issue A_Jan 2016 (1.13 MB, pdf) DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 06 June 2016
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate