NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: MacKenzie v Ibrahim [2016] NSWSC 736 Hearing dates: 19 November 2015, 11 December 2015, 23 February and 2 June 2016 Date of orders: 02 June 2016 Decision date: 02 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Order that the defendants/cross-claimants pay 50 per cent of the plaintiff/cross-defendants' costs of these proceedings incurred from 20 November 2015 to 23 February 2016 and 50 per cent of the costs of the hearing as to costs on 2 June 2016. Catchwords: COSTS – proceedings brought between the parties as to an insolvent property development joint venture – fully contested trial takes place to allocate the burden of losses – but property market improves and as a result of recent sales the joint venture becomes solvent – proceedings are no longer pursued by either party - proceedings discontinued – claim and cross-claim dismissed by consent in February 2016 – parties cannot agree on the proper costs order in the circumstances – contest as to the burden of costs in the period after the Court notified that a final settlement is likely. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 56(3) Cases Cited: Commonwealth v Gretton [2008] NSWCA 117 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; [1997] HCA 6 Skalkos v Assaf (No. 2) [2002] NSWCA 236 Category: Costs Parties: Plaintiff/First Cross Defendant : Donald James MacKenzie Second Cross Defendant: Anita Jane MacKenzie First Defendant/Cross Claimant: Sameh Ibrahim Second Defendant/Cross Claimant: Alahna Ibrahim Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff/Cross Defendants: K.G. Oliver First and Second Defendants/Cross Claimants: A.F. Fernon
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate