NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: ACT Builders Pty Ltd v Haridemos (No 2) [2016] NSWCATAP 118 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 08 June 2016 Decision date: 08 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: M Harrowell, Principal Member S Thode, Senior Member Decision: 1. Pursuant to s50(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act, 2013 Appeal Panel dispenses with a hearing of the costs application by the respondent.
2. The appellant is to pay the costs of the respondent on a party/ party basis, such costs to be as agreed or assessed on the basis set out in the legal costs legislation (as defined in section 3A of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014) Catchwords: Costs- special circumstances, relative strength of case Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Act, 2013 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules, 2014 Cases Cited: 203 Castlereagh Street Pty Ltd v Skybloo Holdings Pty Ltd (No 3) [2015] NSWCATAP 240 Bellgrove v Eldridge [1954] 90 CLR 613 Cripps v G & M Mawson [2006] NSWCA 84 Megerditchian v Kurmond Homes Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 120 Sahyoun v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 75123 (No 2) [2015] NSWCATAP 70 Symes v Mick Fabar Constructions Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1922 Tadrosse v MacFayden & Anor [2015] NSWCATAP 178 Tofighi v Adami [2015] NSWCATAP 260 Wright v Commissioner of Police (Costs) [2015] NSWCATAP 69 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Costs Parties: ACT Builders Pty Ltd (Appellant) Catherine Haridemos (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate