NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jedani v Inner West Council [2016] NSWLEC 1232 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 30 May 2016 Date of orders: 03 June 2016 Decision date: 03 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Morris C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tony Jedani (Applicant) Inner West Council (formerly Leichhardt Council) (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Tomasetti SC (Applicant)
Solicitors: Mr M Bonano, Inner West Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/151122 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. The Appeal is upheld. 2. Leave be granted to change the Respondent's name from Leichhardt Council to Inner West Council. 3. The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans as referred to in the conditions of consent contained in Annexure "A". 4. The Modification application filed with the Court pursuant to s96(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to modify Development Consent D/2014/334 filed with the Court on 8 March 2016 is determined by approving the modifications as set out in Annexure 'A'. 5. As a consequence of order 2, development consent no D/2014/334 is now subject to the consolidated, modified conditions of development consent set out in Annexure 'B' and the consolidated set of plans set out in Annexure 'C'. ……………. Sue Morris Commissioner 151122.2016 Morris (C Annexure A) (210 KB, pdf) 151122.2016 Morris (C Annexure B) (485 KB, pdf) 151122.16 Morris (C Annexure C)) (2.20 MB, pdf) DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 08 June 2016
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate