NSW Caselaw
Local Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: NSW Police v Carrall [2016] NSWLC 4 Hearing dates: 21, 28 January 2016 Decision date: 01 February 2016 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Heilpern LCM Decision: I find the defendant not guilty in respect to the June offence, and will proceed to sentence on the May offence on a date to be fixed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS – drive with illicit drug present in blood – positive test to cannabis – defence of honest and reasonable mistake of fact – availability Legislation Cited: Road Transport Act 2013, s 111 Cases Cited: Appeal of Francesco Mendilicchiu [2008] NSWDC 182 Application by the Attorney General under Section 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act for a Guideline Judgment Concerning the Offence of High Range Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol Under Section 9(4) of the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 (No 3 of 2002) [2004] NSWCCA 303 Bergin v Stack [1953] HCA 53 CTM v The Queen [2008] HCA 25 DPP v Bone [2005] NSWSC 1239 Giachin v Sandon [2013] ACTSC 77 Ostrowski v Palmer (2004) 218 CLR 493 Proudman v Dayman [1941] HCA 28 R v Duong [2015] QCA 170 RTA v O'Reilly & Ors [2009] NSWSC 134 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Joseph Ross Carrall (defendant) NSW Police Representation: Solicitors: Mr Costin-Neilson on 21/1/2016, Mr Huxtable on 28/1/2016 (for the prosecution) Mr Bolt (for the defendant) File Number(s): 2015/237138
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate