Chen v Roads & Maritime Services [2016] NSWLEC 1229

Land and Environment Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Chen v Roads & Maritime Services [2016] NSWLEC 1229 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 2 June 2016 Date of orders: 08 June 2016 Decision date: 08 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Maston AC Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Xueqin Chen (Applicant) Roads and Maritime Services of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Mr A Perkins, Project Lawyers (Applicant) Mr H Kalarostaghi Hunt & Hunt (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/158091 Publication restriction: No

Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement are: 1. The Court notes that the parties or their representatives have reached an agreement in a conciliation conference held on 2 June 2016 pursuant to s.34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, presided over by Acting Commissioner Maston, as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that that would be acceptable to the parties (being a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions). 2. Compensation is determined in the sum of $1,157,953.00, pursuant to section 55 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (Act), for the acquisition of Lot D in Deposited Plan 306471, being the whole of the land in Certificate of Title D/306471 being known as 233 Parramatta Road, Haberfield. 3. The Applicant is to duly complete and deliver to the Respondent the deed of release and indemnity and direction as to payment issued by the Respondent within 28 days of the final orders in these proceedings. 4. Within 28 days of the Respondent receiving the duly completed deed of release and indemnity and direction to payment the Respondent is to pay the compensation less any advanced moneys paid. 5. The Respondent has agreed to pay the Applicant's reasonable costs as agreed or assessed subject to the production of invoices and receipts. ……………. Acting Commissioner Maston DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 08 June 2016