NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Issakidis [2016] NSWSC 747 Hearing dates: 16-18 March 2016, 21-24 March 2016, 29-31 March 2016, 4 April 2016, 7 & 8 April 2016, 11-15 April 2016, 18-22 April 2016, 26 April 2016, 28 April 2016, 2-6 May 2016, 8-13 May 2016, 16-20 May 2016, 23-27 May 2016, 30 May 2016. Date of orders: 16 May 2016 Decision date: 16 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: Pursuant to s 136 of the Evidence Act 2005 (NSW) the use of the document at page 513A of Exhibit A be restricted to evidence of Mr Dickson's state of mind and what he proposed to discuss with the accused. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – conspiracy – whether handwritten note of alleged co-conspirator admissible to prove accused's involvement in conspiracy – Ahern v R – use of evidence restricted – discretion to exclude – whether admissible to prove what was discussed with the accused – use of document restricted. Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 2005 (NSW) – s 136 Cases Cited: - Ahern v R [1988] HCA 39, 165 CLR 87 - R v Dickson, R v Issakidis (Number 9) [2014] NSWSC 1460 - R v Masters, R v Richards, R v Wunderlich (1992) 26 NSWLR 450 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Crown (Commonwealth Prosecutor) Michael John Issakidis (Accused) Representation: Counsel: M. McHugh SC, A.P.C. McGrath (Crown) Michael Byrne QC (Accused)
Solicitors: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Peter Shields Lawyers (Accused) File Number(s): 2012/128506 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate