NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Soyke v R [2016] NSWCCA 112 Hearing dates: 18 May 2016 Decision date: 10 June 2016 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Schmidt J at [2]; Wilson J at [73] Decision: (1) Notice of motion dismissed. (2) Leave to appeal granted. (3) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – leave to appeal and appeal against sentence – whether error in assessment of seriousness of offences – whether sentence was manifestly excessive – no error – appeal dismissed
CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – notice of motion – leave sought to rely on expert reports on appeal – reports not admissible – motion dismissed Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), s 33 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 16BA Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 25A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), ss 477, 478 Cases Cited: Einfeld v R [2010] NSWCCA 87; (2010) 200 A Crim R 1 Khoury v R [2011] NSWCCA 118; (2011) 209 A Crim R 509 R v Lamella [2014] NSWCCA 122 R v Stevens [1999] NSWCCA 69 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Justin Soyke (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Coady (Applicant) Ms M England (Respondent)
Solicitors: Legal Aid Commission (NSW) (Applicant Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/154222 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 15 October 2015 Before: Culver DCJ File Number(s): 2014/154222
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate