NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Newtown Village No. 2 Pty Limited v Magtio Pty Limited [2016] NSWSC 749 Hearing dates: 1 June 2016 Date of orders: 09 June 2016 Decision date: 09 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Declaration made that plaintiff validly extended Call Option Period. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – general contractual principles – construction and interpretation of contracts – Call Option Deed provides for extension of Call Option Period in the event Grantee intends to make application to Land and Environment Court – whether purported extension of Call Option Period in accordance with Call Option Deed – whether intention must be definite rather than provisional
WORDS AND PHRASES – "intends" Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), ss 82, 96, 97 Land and Environmental Court Act 1979 (NSW), s 34 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (NSW), cl 113 Cases Cited: Cunliffe v Goodman [1950] 2 KB 237 Electricity Commission Corporation v Woodside Energy Limited [2014] HCA 7; (2014) 251 CLR 640 Texts Cited: "Terms Implied in Fact: the Basis for Implication" (1998) 13 Journal of Contract Law 103; J W Carter et al, 'Terms Implied in Law: 'Trust and Confidence' in the High Court of Australia" (2015) 32 Journal of Contract Law 203 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Newtown Village No. 2 Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Magtio Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B A Coles QC, S B Docker (Plaintiff) G Drew (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate