NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Pleasance v R [2016] NSWCCA 113 Hearing dates: 13 May 2016 Date of orders: 10 June 2016 Decision date: 10 June 2016 Before: Beazley P at [1] Schmidt J at [2] Wilson J at [3] Decision: 1. Extension of time in which to file an application for leave to appeal is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – whether an extension of time to seek leave to appeal should be granted – supply of prohibited drug - challenge to sentencing judge's assessment of objective seriousness – whether sentencing judge unduly interfered in the sentencing proceedings – whether sentencing judge ought to have admitted a letter from the applicant's mother on sentencing – whether sentence was manifestly excessive – extension of time refused Legislation Cited: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 19865 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ali v R [2010] NSWCCA 35 Ellis v R [2015] NSWCCA 262 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 R v Carter [2003] NSWCCA 243 R v Collin [2000] NSWCCA 236 R v Falls [2004] NSWCCA 335 R v Ha [2004] NSWCCA 386 R v Sciberras [2006] NSWCCA 268; (2006) 165 A Crim R 532 Yuill v Yuill [1945] P 15 Zammit v R [2010] NSWCCA 29 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Melissa Pleasance (Appellant) Regina Representation: Counsel: Mr M Austin (Appellant) Mr N Adams (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate