NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: M V & J M Petronaitis v D M Petronaitis [2016] NSWSC 765 Hearing dates: 6 June 2016 Decision date: 07 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Probate List Before: Black J Decision: Court makes a declaration that the Plaintiffs and Defendant entered into an enforceable agreement on 19 May 2016. Court orders that the agreement be specifically performed; the Defendant execute a document in the form of the Consent Orders by 4pm 8 June 2016; in default of the Defendant's compliance with the order above, the Consent Orders be executed by the Registrar in Equity on Defendant's behalf; the Plaintiffs' reasonable costs of and incidental to the Notice of Motion be paid on an indemnity basis from a fund of the estate comprising the legacy in the sum of $775,000.00 payable to the Defendant; and the hearing dates listed before Stevenson J on 15–17 June 2016 be vacated. There be liberty to apply on 3 business days' notice. Catchwords: CONTRACTS — Existence of contract – where plaintiffs contended that they and the defendant entered into a binding settlement agreement – where defendant denied the existence of a binding contract on the basis that the effect of the mediation agreement between the parties was that any settlement agreement could only be reached in writing – where the defendant also contended that the parties' intention was not to make a concluded bargain unless and until a formal contract was executed – whether a binding agreement existed.
PROCEDURE — Costs – where there were legacies payable out of an estate to the plaintiffs and defendant – where plaintiffs were successful in application seeking a declaration that the plaintiffs and defendant entered into a binding settlement agreement – where plaintiffs contended that their costs of the application be paid on an indemnity basis from the fund of the estate comprising the legacy payable to the defendant – whether costs order sought by the plaintiffs should be made. Legislation Cited: - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 73, 94 - Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 131 - Succession Act 2006 (NSW), s 95 Cases Cited: - Australian Broadcasting Corporation v XIVth Commonwealth Games Ltd (1988) 18 NSWLR 540 - Baulkham Hills Private Hospital Pty Ltd v GR Securities Pty Ltd (1986) 40 NSWLR 622 - Geebung Investments Pty Ltd v Varga Group Investments (No 8) Pty Ltd (1995) 7 BPR 14,551 - Howe v Connell (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Young J, 25 September 1997, unrep) - Jennings v Jennings [2015] NSWSC 1826 Masters v Cameron [1954] HCA 72; (1954) 91 CLR 353 - Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 37; (2015) 325 ALR 188 - Pavlovic v Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 313 - Rilga Nominees Pty Ltd v BHA Holdings Pty Ltd [2014] VSC 632; (2014) 103 ACSR 370 - The Owners - Strata Plan No 58087 v Matthews [2015] NSWSC 1906 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Michael Victor Petronaitis (First Plaintiff/Applicant) John Martin Petronaitis (Second Plaintiff/Applicant) Dalia Maria Petronaitis (Defendant/Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J P Muir (Plaintiffs/Applicants) R D Marshall (Defendant/Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate