NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Luxford v Department of Education and Communities [2016] NSWCATAD 118 Hearing dates: 19 October 2015, 2 November 2015 Date of orders: 17 June 2016 Decision date: 17 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: Access to government information - overriding public interest against disclosure - personal information - information provided to an agency in confidence - information provided to the agency during an investigation - prejudice supply of confidential information - prejudice effective exercise of agency's functions Legislation Cited: Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Civil And Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Freedom of Information Act 1989 Cases Cited: AMH v Western New South Wales Local Health District [2013] NSWADT 282 Attorney General's Department v Cockcroft (1986) 10 FCR 180 Cameron v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2014] NSWCATAD 13 Camilleri v Commissioner of Police (NSW) [2013] NSWADT 80 Cheney v Mid North Coast Local Health District [2014] NSWCATAD 220 Commissioner of Police (NSW) v Camilleri [2012] NSWADTAP 19 Cousins v Ambulance Service (NSW) [2014] NSWCATAD 48 Department of Education and Training v Mullett (No 2) [2002] NSWADTAP 29 Director General, Department of Education & Training v Mullett & anor (GD) [2002] NSWADTAP 13 Fahey v NSW Office of Liquor, Gaming and Racing [2012] NSWADT 181 Fire Brigade Employees' Union v Fire and Rescue NSW [2014] NSWCATAD 113 Flack v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2011] NSWADT 286 Hurst v Wagga Wagga City Council [2011] NSWADT 307 Jenkinson v Department of Education and Communities [2013] NSWADT 280 Leda Developments Pty Limited v Tweed Shire Council [2013] NSWADT 121 Macquarie University v Howell (No 2) [2009] NSWADTAP 19 Mansfield v Department of Family and Community Services (NSW) [2014] NSWCATAD 43 McInnes v Department of Education and Training [2013] NSWADT 219 McKinnon v Blacktown City Council [2012] NSWADT 44 McKinnon v Department of Treasury [2006] HCA 45 Office of Liquor, Gaming and Racing v Fahey [2012] NSWADTAP 55 Public Service Association and Professional Officers Association, Amalgamated Union of NSW v Director General, Premier's Department [2002] NSWADT 277 Re B and Brisbane North Regional Health Authority [1994] QICmr 1; (1993) 1 QAR 279 Re Waterford and Department of the Treasury (No 2) (1984) 5 ALD 588 Searle Australia Pty Limited v Public Interest Advocacy Centre and Another (1992) 108 ALR 163 Singh v Legal Aid Commission (No. 2) [2015] NSWCATAD 5 Williams v Department Industry and Investment [2012] NSWADT 192 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Warren Luxford (Applicant) Department of Education and Communities (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: W Luxford (Applicant in Person) Crown Solicitors Office (Respondent) File Number(s): 1510219 Publication restriction: Section 64 of the Civil And Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 applies to those paragraphs of these reasons identified as [not for publication]. Those paragraphs are not to be released to either the Applicant or to the public.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate