NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Eyes v Wyong Shire Council [2016] NSWCATAD 120 Hearing dates: 20 October 2015 Date of orders: 16 June 2016 Decision date: 16 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member Decision: The application for access to the requested information is refused. Catchwords: Government Information – public Interest considerations in favour of disclosure – public interest considerations against disclosure - prejudice to effective exercise of agency functions - information provided in confidence - prejudice to the conduct, effectiveness or integrity of an investigation - diminish the competitive commercial value of the information - prejudice to legitimate business and commercial interests Legislation Cited: Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Freedom of Information Act 1989 Cases Cited: "B" and Brisbane North Regional Health Authority [1994] QICmr 1; (1994) 1 QAR 279 Attorney General's Department v Cockcroft [1986] FCA 35; (1986) 10 FCR 180 Battin v University of New England [2013] NSWADT 73 Commissioner of Police v Camilleri [2012] NSWADTAP 19 Leichhardt Municipal Council v Roads and Traffic Authority [2005] NSWADT 37 McKinnon v Blacktown City Council [2012] NSWADT 44 Media Research Group Pty Ltd v Department of Premier and Cabinet (GD) [2011] NSWADTAP 7 Moran v Shellhabour City Council [2011] NSWADT 241 Nature Conservation Council of NSW v Department of Trade and Investment Regional Infrastructure and Services [2012] NSWADT 195 Seeney and Department of State Development [2004] QlCmr 4 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Laurie Maxwell Eyes (Applicant) Wyong Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: E Whitby (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate