NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Treadtel International Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 791 Hearing dates: 4 December 2015 and 4 March 2016 Decision date: 20 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: The parties are directed to bring in short minutes of order to give effect to the reasons for judgment. Catchwords: PROCEDURAL – Application for leave to amend statement of claim to seek relief under s 233 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – principles applicable – plaintiff claims second defendant holds share in first defendant on trust for plaintiff – whether plaintiff lacks standing because he is not recorded as a member of the first defendant in the register of members – different grounds for standing relied upon by plaintiff – arguable that plaintiff has standing to sue as beneficiary of trust in respect of share held by second defendant – exceptional circumstances – second defendant with conflict of interest and unwilling to sue – other alleged bases for standing permitted – leave to amend granted – application not too late – original pleading not a result of a tactical decision – application for leave to amend in part a result of defence pleaded
LEAVE – conditions on which leave to amend granted – costs occasioned by the amendment, including costs thrown away payable by plaintiff – plaintiff not ordered to pay additional security for costs – plaintiff required to discontinue related proceedings in Italy on a permanent basis – plaintiff required to pay defendant's costs of Italian proceedings Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; (2009) 239 CLR 175 Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Gold Mines Ltd [1993] HCA 15; (1993) 177 CLR 485 Dymocks Book Arcade Pty Ltd v Capral Ltd (formerly Alcan Australia Ltd) [2011] NSWSC 1423 General Steel Industries v Commissioner for Railways (1964) 112 CLR 125 In the matter of Treadtel International Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1406; 104 ACSR 1Niord Pty Ltd v Adelaide Lidden v Composite Buyers Ltd (1996) 67 FCR 560 Mercedes Holdings Pty Ltd v Waters (No 3) [2011] FCA 236 Petroleum NL (1990) 54 SASR 87; (1990) 2 ACSR 347 Ramage v Waclaw (1988) 12 NSWLR 84 Re Independent Quarries Pty Ltd (1993) 12 ACSR 188 Saad v State of New South Wales (No 4) [2014] NSWSC 353 TAL Life Ltd v Shuetrim [2016] NSWCA 68 Telecom Vanuatu Ltd v Optus Networks Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 951 Titlow v Intercapital Group (Australia) Pty Ltd (1996) 65 FCR 449; (1996) 144 ALR 203; (1996) 20 ACSR 201 Texts Cited: Ford, Austin and Ramsay's Principles of Corporations Law (16th ed, 2014) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Pierro Cocco (plaintiff) Treadtel International P/L (first defendant) Richard Crosher (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Sulan/G P Gee (plaintiff) J Thomson (first defendant) D Robertson (second defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate