NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lindsay v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2016] NSWCATAP 128 Hearing dates: 4 March 2016 Date of orders: 16 June 2016 Decision date: 16 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: A Coleman SC, Senior Member T Simon, Senior Member Decision: (1) The appeal is allowed (2) The orders made on 12 November 2015 are set aside (3) The proceedings are remitted to the Consumer and Commercial Division for rehearing by a differently constituted Tribunal. Catchwords: Error of law, leave, Residential Tenancy, s91, meaning of serious, meaning of intentional, against the weight of evidence, exercise of discretion Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW) Residential Tenancies Act NSW 2010 Cases Cited: Bridge Housing Limited v Jules Cure [2015] NSWCATCD 39 Chi Building Pty Ltd v Wedgewood [2016] NSWCATAP 64 Cure v Bridge Housing Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 80 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP Geoffrey William Vines v Australian Securities and Investment Commission [2007] NSWCA 126 House v The King [1936] HCA 40 (1936) 55 CLR 499 Jackson v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2014] NSWCATAP 22 NSW Land and Housing Corporation v Stephen Kline [2014] NSWCATCD 210 John Prendergast & Vanessa Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Xenos v St George Community Housing [2015] NSWCATAP 273 Yong v Antworks Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAP 14 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Todd Lindsay (Appellant) NSW Land and Housing Corporation (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms Manstead for the Appellant Mr Gardner for the Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate