NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Abdul-Hamid v R [2016] NSWCCA 118 Hearing dates: 18 May 2016 Decision date: 21 June 2016 Before: Basten JA at [1] Schmidt J at [2] Wilson J at [3] Decision: Leave to appeal refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – knowingly take part in the supply of a prohibited drug – question of objective gravity of offence – asserted error in fact finding at sentence following trial – question of applicant's knowledge of quantity of prohibited drug – question of his role compared to that of a co-offender Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 16(1) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 25(1), 29 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 38 Cases Cited: DPP (NSW) v Knight [2006] NSWSC 646; (2006) 162 A Crim R 555 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 R v Dossi (1918) 13 Cr App R 158 R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374 R v VHP (1997) 4 Crim LN 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Feras Abdul-Hamid (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Lange (Applicant) Mr H Baker (Respondent)
Solicitors: Lawyerscorp (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2013/00256546 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 5 June 2015 Before: Arnott SC DCJ File Number(s): 2013/00256546
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate