NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kennedy v R [2016] NSWCCA 123 Hearing dates: 4 May 2016 Decision date: 23 June 2016 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; R A Hulme J at [2]; R S Hulme AJ at [50] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – wound with intent to cause grievous bodily harm – no error in assessment of objective seriousness – provocative conduct appropriately taken into account – obvious "slip" referring to death of victim did not affect assessment – no error in finding moral culpability not significantly diminished due to applicant's background – no error in finding no significant diminution for requirements of general and specific deterrence or denunciation – applicant appreciated gravity and consequences of conduct – sentence not manifestly excessive – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 33(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 21A, 44 Cases Cited: Kentwell v R [2014] HCA37; 252 CLR 601 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v Millwood [2012] NSWCCA 2 R v Wright (1997) 93 A Crim R 48 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Damien James Kennedy (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms H Cox (Applicant) Ms M Cinque SC (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate