NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Naizmand [2016] NSWSC 836 Hearing dates: 16 June 2016 Date of orders: 27 June 2016 Decision date: 27 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: Application for bail refused Catchwords: BAIL – application for bail – Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) – terrorism offences – whether offences serious examples of the particular offending – access to proscribed online content – alleged breach of control order –where applicant required to show the existence of exceptional circumstances – where applicant held in harsh custodial conditions – where applicant in custody for first time – whether Crown case strong – whether unacceptable delay likely – exceptional circumstances not shown Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Haddara v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions [2006] VSC 8 R v Azari (Unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Garling J, 3 September 2015) R v Khaled Cheikho (Unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Studdert J, 15 May 2006) R v Mulahalilovic (Unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Rothman J, 1 August 2006) R v Mulvihill [2013] NSWSC 1190 R v NK [2016] NSWSC 498 R v Young [2006] NSWSC 1499 Raad v DPP [2007] VSC 330 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ahmad Saiyer Naizmand (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: E Ozen (Applicant) M England (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate