NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Halac v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police [2016] NSWCA 146 Hearing dates: 22 June 2016 Date of orders: 22 June 2016 Decision date: 23 June 2015 Before: McColl JA; Ward JA; Leeming JA Decision: Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: PROCEEDS OF CRIME – application for extension order refused by primary judge – whether appeal futile by reason of expiration of 15 month period from conviction day – leave refused – Studman v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2007] NSWCA 285; 177 A Crim R 34 applied Legislation Cited: Forfeiture Act 1870 (Eng) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 78B Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth), ss 18, 92, 93, 94 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 23, 75A Cases Cited: Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v C G Berbatis Holdings Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1151; 95 FCR 292 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Chan [2001] NSWCA 249; 52 NSWLR 56 Gypsy Jokers Motorcycle Club Incorporated v Commissioner of Police [2008] HCA 4; 234 CLR 532 Halac v R [2015] NSWCCA 121 Studman v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2007] NSWCA 285; 177 A Crim R 34 The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Halac [2015] NSWSC 520 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Sven Halac (Applicant) Commissioner of Australian Federal Police (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: N Siafakas (Applicant) A J Sullivan QC, K Williams (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate