NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of NSW v Sancar [2016] NSWSC 867 Hearing dates: 16 June 2016 Date of orders: 24 June 2016 Decision date: 24 June 2016 Before: Garling J Decision: (1) Summons filed 24 May 2016 is dismissed. (2) Order the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for interim relief pursuant to the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), s 7(4) – whether Court satisfied that the material would, if proved, justify the making of an extended supervision order – whether Court satisfied to a high degree of probability that offender poses an unacceptable risk of committing a serious violence offence if not kept under supervision Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 Cases Cited: Attorney-General for NSW v Gallagher [2006] NSWSC 340 Attorney-General for NSW v Quinn [2007] NSWSC 873 Attorney-General for NSW v Winters [2007] NSWSC 611 Attorney-General for the State of NSW v Tillman [2007] NSWCA 119 Cornwall v Attorney-General for NSW [2007] NSWCA 374 Lynn v State of NSW [2016] NSWCA 57 State of NSW v Lynn [2013] NSWSC 1147 State of NSW v Manners [2008] NSWSC 1242 State of NSW v Pacey [2015] NSWSC 1983 State of NSW v Thomas (Preliminary) [2011] NSWSC 118 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of NSW (P) Yuksel Sancar (D) Representation: Counsel: T Hammond (P) D O'Neil (D)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate