NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Tarrant [2016] NSWSC 892 Hearing dates: 24 June 2016 Date of orders: 28 June 2016 Decision date: 28 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Fagan J Decision: The application that Fagan J recuse himself from further hearing of sentence proceedings in respect of Sarah Tarrant following upon her conviction of manslaughter on 14 May 2016 is dismissed. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – apprehension of bias – conduct – whether judge should recuse himself – questions directed to applicant as witness – applicant convicted – trial judge's duty to afford fair hearing to parties – admissible evidence – whether pre-judgment of issues to be resolved in sentencing proceedings – actual bias Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Dwayhi v R; Bechara v R [2011] NSWCCA 67 Ebner v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; (2000) 205 CLR 337 Galea v Galea (1990) 19 NSWLR 263 Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48; (2000) 201 CLR 488 R v Esposito (1998) 45 NSWLR 442 Webb v The Queen [1994] HCA 30; (1994) 181 CLR 41 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Sarah Renea Tarrant (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms Janet Manuell SC/Mr Ian Nash (Applicant) Mr Peter McGrath (Respondent)
Solicitors: Ms Narelle Marshall, Legal Aid Commission (Applicant) Ms Gizelle Van Zyl, Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2013/243004 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate