NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Singh [2016] NSWCATOD 85 Hearing dates: 29 April 2016 Date of orders: 29 June 2016 Decision date: 29 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Boland ADCJ, Deputy President Decision: 1. The Tribunal consents to the withdrawal of the application for disciplinary findings and orders lodged on 11 September 2015. Catchwords: HEALTH PRACTITIONER REGULATION NATIONAL LAW – Where disciplinary proceedings instituted against a medical practitioner – where practitioner has left the jurisdiction and has not been served with the initiating application – where practitioner's registration is suspended. Consideration of whether proceedings should be adjourned sine die or withdrawn Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW) Cases Cited: Hall v Nominal Defendant (1966) HCA36; 117 CLR 423 Texts Cited: Osborn's Concise Law Dictionary Stroud's Judicial Dictionary of Words and Phrases Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Dr Raghubir Singh (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Tronson (Applicant) No appearance by or on behalf of the Respondent
Solicitors: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) File Number(s): 1520184 Publication restriction: Not applicable
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate