NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Raad v VM & KTP Holdings Pty Ltd as Trustee for VM & KTP Nguyen Family Trust [2016] NSWSC 888 Hearing dates: 26-30 October 2015 & 25 November 2015 Date of orders: 29 June 2016 Decision date: 29 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: 1. Judgment for the Plaintiff for $75,547. 2. I will hear the parties on costs. Catchwords: TORTS – negligence – slip and fall – plaintiff falls on wet tiles at shopping centre – tiles exposed to rain – breach of duty – whether insignificant risk – risk of persons slipping – reasonable response to risk -whether tiles should have been coated in non-slip surface – whether tiles should have been replaced – whether obvious risk – contributory negligence – whether plaintiff adjusted speed of travel when stepping onto tiles – causation – plaintiff suffering from Scheuermann's disease – damage caused by fall limited in time – development of pain syndrome – psychological issues – absence of medical evidence to establish causation of pain syndrome and psychological issues TORTS – damages – plaintiff's immigration status – whether prohibited from working – error by Department of Immigration Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Garzo v Liverpool / Campbelltown Christian School [2012] NSWCA 151 Schultz v McCormack [2015] NSWCA 330 Smith's Newspapers Ltd v Becker (1932) 47 CLR 279 State Rail Authority of NSW v Wiegold (1991) 25 NSWLR 500 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Abdul Raad (Plaintiff) VM & KTP Holdings Pty Ltd as Trustee for VM & KTP Nguyen Family Trust (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: V Jurisich (Plaintiff) R Gambi (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate