NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Qaumi & Ors (No 43) [2016] NSWSC 889 Hearing dates: 27 June 2016 Date of orders: 27 June 2016 Decision date: 27 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Hamill J Decision: Application to ask further questions in cross-examination granted. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – joint trial – application to ask further questions in cross-examination – where co-accused raising defence of duress – where evidence not led in chief emerge during cross-examination after conclusion of cross-examination – fairness to accused required opportunity to put his case – no unfairness to co-accused – application granted
CRIMINAL LAW – joint trial – application to ask further questions in cross-examination – where co-accused raising defence of duress – when counsel puts one version and co-accused puts alternative version – where both versions contained in statement – where evidence left in state of uncertainty and confusion – whether unfair – application granted Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: R v Qaumi & Ors (No 23) [2016] NSWSC 429 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 24) [2016] NSWSC 505 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 32) [2016] NSWSC 675 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 39) [2016] NSWSC 797 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Farhad Qaumi Mumtaz Qaumi Jamil Qaumi Mohammed Zarshoy Mohammed Kalal Representation: Counsel: K McKay & P Hogan (Crown) J Stratton SC & M Curry (F Qaumi) P Young SC (M Quami) N Carroll(J Quami) R Driels (Zarshoy) G Clarke (Kalal)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate