NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Agius [2016] NSWSC 894 Hearing dates: 22, 23 March 2016 Decision date: 01 July 2016 Before: R A Hulme J Decision: 1. Pursuant to s 116 of the Act, the defendant, Robert Francis Agius, pay to the Commonwealth a pecuniary penalty in the amount of $580,295. 2. The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: PRCOCEEDS OF CRIME – pecuniary penalty order – conspiracy to defraud the Commonwealth –proper approach to calculation of the benefit derived from the offences – assessment is not confined to the net benefit derived by the defendant personally – proper statutory approach includes all property under the defendant's effective control Legislation Cited: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 2C(1) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) ss 29D, 86(1) Criminal Code (Cth) s 135.4(5) Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) Pt 2-4, ss 336, 337, 338 Cases Cited: Agius v R [2015] NSWCCA 200 Cornwell v Commissioner of Australian Federal Police (1990) 24 FCR 544 R v Agius; R v Zerafa [2012] NSWSC 978 R v May [2008] UKHL 28; [2008] 1 AC 1028 The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Fysh [2013] NSWSC 81; 224 A Crim R 523 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (Plaintiff) Robert Francis Agius (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr P McGuire SC (Plaintiff) Mr P Coady (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate