NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Rocha Pty Ltd (Deregistered) [2016] NSWSC 899 Hearing dates: Monday, 23 May 2016 Date of orders: 22 June 2016 Decision date: 22 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: Application for declaration that dissolution of company dissolved in 1980 is void dismissed, on basis that there is no longer any jurisdiction to make such an order Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – dissolution – striking off of defunct company – reinstatement – where company struck off under (NSW) Companies Act 1961 – no jurisdiction under (CTH) Corporations Act 2001 – whether jurisdiction available under (NSW) Companies Act 1961 – where Act repealed in 2008 – held, jurisdiction no longer available – whether revesting order required where dissolution declared void – held, not required Legislation Cited: (CTH) Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 1989, s 253, s 254 (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 9, s 601AH, s 1371, s 1378 (CTH) Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001, s 8(1), s 261 (NSW) Companies Act 1961, s 307, s 308, s 310 (NSW) Companies (Application of Laws) Act 1981, s 6, s 23 (NSW) Companies (New South Wales) Code 1981, s 459 (NSW) Corporations (New South Wales) Act 1990, s 84 Cases Cited: Armitage v HXE Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1109 Baird v WJT Howes Investments Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1232; (2008) 68 ACSR 485 Best v Yellow Express Carriers Ltd [2004] NSWSC 666 C W Dixon Ltd, Re [1947] Ch 251 City West Water Ltd v Mr D Investments Pty Ltd [2002] VSC 553; (2002) 171 FLR 392 Kilkenny Engineering Pty Ltd, Re (1976) 1 ACLR 285 Morris v Harris [1927] AC 252 Parker v Australian Asbestos Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 520 Servers of the Blind League, Re [1960] 1 WLR 564 Shaw v Goodsmith Industries Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 406 Smith v White Knight Laundry Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 660; [2001] 3 All ER 862 Tan v ASIC [2011] NSWSC 58 Wangi Wangi Development Co Ltd, Re (1994) 12 ACLC 297 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Romeesh Amar (plaintiff) Representation: Counsel: J Dooley (plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate