NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Prajna Monastery Australia Inc v Georges River Council [2016] NSWLEC 1272 Hearing dates: 7, 8 March 2016 Date of orders: 29 June 2016 Decision date: 29 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Pearson C Decision: 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. Development Application No 2014/0978 for the use of an existing dwelling as a Buddhist monastery providing residential accommodation for 3 nuns and the construction of a meditation hall and memorial hall with basement and on-site parking at 14 Wright Street Hurstville is refused. 3. The exhibits are returned except for Exhibits 3, A, L, M and O. 4. Pursuant to s 97B(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 the applicant is to pay those costs of the consent authority that are thrown away as a result of the amendment of the application in the amount of $8,000.00. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Place of worship – Buddhist monastery, meditation hall and memorial hall – Consistency with character of local area – Impacts on amenity of adjoining properties – Traffic and parking –Landscaping – Impact on heritage item Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Hurstville Local Environmental Plan 2012 Cases Cited: Amazonia Hotels Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Sydney [2014] NSWLEC 1247 Benevolent Society v Waverley Council [2010] NSWLEC 1082 Futurespace Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2009] NSWLEC 153 Renaldo Plus 3 Pty Ltd v Hurstville City Council [2005] NSWLEC 315 Zhang v Canterbury City Council [2001] NSWCA 167 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Prajna Monastery Australia Inc (Applicant) Georges River Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms L M Saw (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate