NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Burbridge v R [2016] NSWCCA 128 Hearing dates: 6 November 2015 Date of orders: 01 July 2016 Decision date: 01 July 2016 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Rothman J at [5]; Bellew J at [50] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted;
(2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – child pornography offences – manifest excess – totality – interaction of Commonwealth and State sentencing regimes – no error identifiable or manifest – appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crime (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: AB v The Queen [1999] HCA 46; (1999) 148 CLR 111 Assafiri v R [2007] NSWCCA 159 Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; (2013) 249 CLR 571 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 Fitzgerald v R [2015] NSWCCA 266 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; (2014) 252 CLR 601 Lowndes v The Queen [1999] HCA 29; (1999) 195 CLR 665 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Payda v R [2013] NSWCCA 109 R v De Leeuw [2015] NSWCCA 183 R v Linardon [2014] NSWCCA 247 R v Martin [2014] NSWCCA 283 R v Porte [2015] NSWCCA 174 Wong and Leung v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tristan David Burbridge (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Evers (Applicant) P McGuire SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate