NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Rizk v FA Constructions Australia Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 155 Hearing dates: 01 July 2016 Decision date: 01 July 2016 Before: Basten JA; Leeming JA; Sackville AJA Decision: Notice of motion filed 6 May 2016 dismissed Catchwords: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – review of single judge of appeal – order for referral for pro bono legal assistance limited to advice on prospects of success – applicant sought a referral extending to preparation and appearing on appeal – whether decision amenable to review under Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 46(4) – decision appropriate in any event given history and nature of the litigation – motion dismissed Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 39, 46, 69 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 7.33, 7.35, 7.36, 7.39, 7.40 Cases Cited: Rajski v Wood (1989) 18 NSWLR 512 Rizk v FA Constructions Australia Pty Ltd (District Court (NSW), 25 July 2014, unrep) Sinkovich v Attorney General of New South Wales [2013] NSWCA 383; 85 NSWLR 783 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Moussa Rizk (Applicant) FA Constructions Australia Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant in person N Polin SC (Respondent)
Solicitors: Moray & Agnew (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/28148 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Court of Appeal Date of Decision: 2 May 2016 Before: Barrett AJA File Number(s): 2016/28148
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate