NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Permanent Custodians Limited v Geagea (No 4) [2016] NSWSC 934 Hearing dates: 16 July 2015 Date of orders: 07 July 2016 Decision date: 07 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) Leave is granted to the fourth to sixth defendants to re-open to argue apportionment;
(2) The damages assessed on the basis of a breach of warranty of authority were not, in the circumstances of this claim, apportionable;
(3) The plaintiff will bring in short minutes of an order reflecting the judgments of the Court in this matter within 7 days of the delivery of this judgment. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to re-open proceedings after reasons for judgment had issued but before entry of judgment – whether economic loss for breach of warranty of authority is apportionable claim under Civil Liability Act – application to re-open granted – economic loss not able to be apportioned. Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 Civil Procedure Act 2005 Fair Trading Act 1987 Cases Cited: Adams (Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation (Victoria)) v Chas. S. Watson Pty Ltd [1938] HCA 37; (1938) 60 CLR 545 Alramadan v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (No 2) [2008] NSWCCA 69 Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) [1993] HCA 6; (1993) 176 CLR 300 Brown v Brown [1993] 31 NSWLR 582 Collen v Wright (1857) 8 E. & B. 647; (1857) 27 L. J. (Q.B.) 215 Coulton v Holcombe [1986] HCA 33; (1986) 162 CLR 1 Dartberg Pty Ltd v Wealthcare Financial Planning Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1216; (2007) 164 FCR 450; (2007) 244 ALR 552 Elliott v the Queen; Blessington v the Queen [2007] HCA 51; (2007) 234 CLR 38 Gosling v Gaskell [1897] AC 575 Khan v Hadid (No 3) [2008] NSWSC 819 Lee v Irons [1958] VR 436 Leggo v Brown & Dureau Ltd [1923] HCA 19; (1923) 32 CLR 95 Permanent Custodians Limited v Geagea [2014] NSW SC 562 Permanent Custodians Limited v Geagea (No 3) [2014] NSW SC 1489 Pittalis and Another v Grant and Another [1989] 2 All ER 622 Podrebersek v Australian Iron and Steel Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 34; (1985) 59 ALJR 492 Reinhold v New South Wales Lotteries Corporation (No 2) [2008] NSWSC 187; (2008) NSWLR 762 Teoh v Minister for Immigration, Local Government & Ethnic Affairs (1994) 49 FCR 409; (1994) 121 ALR 436 Collen v Wright (1857) 8 E. & B. 647; (1857) 27 L. J. (Q.B.) 215 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Permanent Custodians Limited (Plaintiff/Respondent) Tony Geagea (First Defendant) Charbel Geagea (Second Defendant) David Geagea (Third Defendant) Phillip Howard Symonds (Fourth Defendant/First Applicant) Christopher James Swanson (Fifth Defendant/Second Applicant) Terence Edmund Ledlin (Sixth Defendant/Third Applicant) Representation: Counsel: M Ashhurst SC/S Docker (Plaintiff/Respondent) No Appearance (First, Second and Third Defendants) G Watson SC/J Downing (Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Defendants/First, Second and Third Applicants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate