NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Pratten (No 26) [2016] NSWSC 935 Hearing dates: 29 April 2016 Date of orders: 29 April 2016 Decision date: 29 April 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: The adjournment is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PRACTICE – application for adjournment of sentencing – constitutional issue raised and application for vacation of sentencing hearing – no arguable point – matter previously unsuccessfully raised, appeal lodged and withdrawn – adjournment refused. Legislation Cited: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Cases Cited: Pratten v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions [2013] NSWSC 594 Re Coldham; Ex Parte Municipal Officers Association of Australia (also cited as Re Architects of Australia Association; Ex Parte Municipal Officers' Association) [1989] HCA 13; (1989) 63 ALJR 298 Sullivan v Department of Transport (1978) 20 ALR 323 United Voice v Restaurant and Catering Association of Victoria [2014] FCAFC 121; (2014) 226 FCR 255 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Timothy Charles Pratten (Offender) Representation: Counsel: D Moorhouse (Crown) B Dean (Offender)
Solicitors: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) O'Brien & Hudson Solicitors (Offender) File Number(s): 2010/315475
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate