NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Galiatsatos v Legal Profession Admission Board [2016] NSWCATAD 143 Hearing dates: 21 June 2016 Date of orders: 05 July 2016 Decision date: 05 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Hennessy LCM, Deputy President Decision: The applicant's applications for administrative review of the following decisions made by the Legal Profession Admission Board are dismissed: (1) the decision communicated to the applicant by letter of 13 November 2015 to grant her request to re-enter the course subject to conditions; (2) the decision communicated to the applicant by letter of 18 April 2016 to exclude her from the course; (3) the decision to remove all past exam papers from the Legal Profession Admission Board's website at the end of the exam period in September 2016; and (4) the decision communicated to the applicant by email of 7 April 2016 that any application under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) should be directed to the Department of Justice. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW – scope of application for review – jurisdiction of Tribunal to review decisions made by Legal Profession Admission Board – whether the Board is an "agency" for the purpose of the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW), s 9 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 29(2) and s 30 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW), ss 4, 6, 18, 80, 100, Sch 1 cl 4; Sch 4 cl 6 Government Information (Public Access) Regulation 2009 (NSW), Sch 3 cl 12 Government Sector Employment Act 2013 (NSW), s 3, Sch 1 Parts 1, 2 and 3 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Debbie Galiatsatos (Applicant) Legal Profession Admission Board (Respondent) Representation: Self-represented (Applicant) Legal Profession Admission Board (Respondent) File Number(s): 1610266 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate