NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Qaumi & Ors (No 45) [2016] NSWSC 937 Hearing dates: 29-30 June 2016 Date of orders: 30 June 2016 Decision date: 30 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Hamill J Decision: Application for separate trial is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application to separate one of five co-accused – where application made in thirteenth week of trial – retrospective and prospective evaluation of fairness of the proceedings – where co-accused asserts duress – where co-accused relying on evidence of violence and threats of violence by three accused – evidence admissible in Crown case – analogy to cut-throat defence – whether order of cross-examination creates unfairness – threat to withdraw instructions of lawyers – not a relevant consideration – genuine belief in three accused that process unfair – no unfairness when viewed objectively – remedies for forensic disadvantage – whether cross-examination undermining effectiveness of attacks on credibility – resurrecting Lazarus – neutral position of fifth co-accused – "when elephants fight ants stay out of the way" – application refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Madubuko v R [2011] NSWCCA 135 R v CE [2005] NSWCCA 326 R v Farrell & Cotton (1990) 48 A Crim R 311 R v Ignjatic(1993) 68 A Crim R 333 R v Pham [2004] NSWCCA 190 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 3) (Severance and Separate Trials) [2016] NSWSC 15 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 6) [2016] NSWSC 115 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 24) NSWSC 505 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 32) [2016] NSWSC 675 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 33) [2016] NSWSC 676 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 39) [2016] NSWSC 797 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 43) [2016] NSWSC 889 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 44) [2016] NSWSC 936 R v Singh (Supreme Court (NSW), Fullerton J, 10 November 2011, unrep) Webb & Hay v The Queen [1994] HCA 30; 181 CLR 41 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Farhad Qaumi Mumtaz Qaumi Jamil Qaumi Mohammed Zarshoy Mohammed Kalal Representation: Counsel: K McKay & P Hogan (Crown) J Stratton SC & M Curry (F Qaumi) P Young SC (M Quami) N Carroll(J Quami) R Driels (Zarshoy) G Clarke (Kalal)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate