NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Constantine v Blacktown City Council (No 2) [2016] NSWLEC 81 Hearing dates: 11, 12, 13 and 14 April 2016 Decision date: 06 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Moore J Decision: See [166] to [172]. SMO to be provided by 27 July 2016 to reflect the decision. Catchwords: COMPULSORY ACQUISITION – underlying zonings absent the public purpose – position agreed for portion of the acquired land – approach to be taken when little difference between valuers – position more beneficial to disposed owner adopted COMPULSORY ACQUISITION – underlying zonings absent the public purpose – whether process for consideration of ecological issues related to the public purpose – ecological issues considered in broader planning context separate from public purpose – conservation zoning appropriate absent the public purpose COMPULSORY ACQUISITION – possibility of land with underlying conservation zoning being up-zoned to permit development (absent the public purpose) – no realistic prospect of up-zoning – compensation for portion of the land with an underlying conservation zoning to be determined solely on that basis COMPULSORY ACQUISITION – claim for disturbance – claim partially disputed – two elements disallowed but remainder allowed – claimed items must relate to the present acquisition process not pre-acquisition negotiations – claimed items must relate to the present actual use of the land not some possible future use of the land Legislation Cited: Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006 Cases Cited: Adams v Valuer General [2014] NSWLEC1005 Constantine v Blacktown City Council [2016] NSWLEC 56 Fitzpatrick Investments Pty Limited v Blacktown City Council (No. 2) [2000] NSWLEC 139; 108 LGERA 417 Maloney v Minister Administering the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 [2011] NSWLEC 121 Mir Bros Unit Constructions Pty Ltd v Roads & Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2006] NSWCA 314 Sydney Water Corporation v Caruso and Ors [2009] NSWCA 391; 170 LGERA 298 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mario Constantine (Applicant) Blacktown City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr I Hemmings SC/Mr S Nash, barrister (Applicant) Mr A Galasso SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate