NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Segal v Osborne [2016] NSWSC 941 Hearing dates: 22, 23 March, 12 May 2016 Date of orders: 07 July 2016 Decision date: 07 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Amended Statement of Claim is dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CONVEYANCING – completion of contract – claim for reduction of purchase price owing to damage to land – whether damage to land through removal of fixtures – whether damage to land because of substantial quantity of rubbish on land – Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 66M
REAL PROPERTY – fixtures to land – dealings with and affecting fixtures – whether dishwasher fixture or chattel – whether incomplete kitchen cabinet fixture or chattel – whether large free standing wardrobes fixtures or chattels
CONVEYANCING – contract for sale – clause provided for purchase price to increase if completion occurred after nominated completion date, except where "actual completion is delayed because of vendor's default" – whether completion delayed because of vendor's default
EQUITY – trusts and trustees – powers, duties, rights and liabilities of trustees – statutory trustees for sale –duty of care in respect of trust property – whether breach of duty by failing to levy occupation fee – whether breach of duty to act impartially by permitting one beneficiary to remain in occupation without fee
WORDS AND PHRASES – "vendor's default" Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), ss 66G, 66M Cases Cited: Agripower Barrabara Pty Limited v Blomfield [2015] NSWCA 30 Arida v Arida [2015] NSWCA 170 Australian Provincial Assurance Co Limited v Coroneo (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 700 Cumberland Consolidated Holdings Limited v Ireland [1946] KB 264 Foran v Wight (1989) 168 CLR 385 Fouche v Superannuation Fund Board (1952) 88 CLR 609 Harb v Harb [2010] NSWSC 1251 Harvey v Barton (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 1478 Hawkins v Farley [1997] 2 Qd R 361 Luu v Sovereign Developments Pty Limited [2006] NSWCA 40 McCrohon v Harith [2010] NSWCA 67 NH Dunn v LM Ericsson Pty Limited (1979) 2 BPR 9241 National Australia Bank Limited v Blacker [2000] FCA 1458; (2000) 104 FCR 288 Palumberi v Palumberi (1986) 4 BPR 9106 Segal v Barel [2013] NSWCA 92 Segal v Barel (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 148 TEC Desert Pty Limited v Commissioner of State Revenue (WA) [2010] HCA 49; (2010) 241 CLR 576 Zaps Transport (Aust) Pty Limited v PJG Warehousing and Distribution Pty Limited [2016] NSWCA 97 Texts Cited: Megarry and Wade, The Law of Real Property (7th ed 2008) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Phillip Segal (Plaintiff) Michael Osborne (First Defendant) Margaret Colleen Hole (Second Defendant) Elie Barel (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Cornish (Plaintiff) S Chapple (First and Second Defendants) C Gleeson (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate