NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: PC v R [2016] NSWCCA 137 Hearing dates: 20 November 2015 Date of orders: 15 July 2016 Decision date: 15 July 2016 Before: Simpson JA at [1] Johnson J at [2] Davies J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted.
(2) Appeal upheld.
(3) Quash the sentence of the District Court imposed on 17 October 2014. In lieu, sentence the Appellant as follows:
(a) On count 2 sentence the Appellant to imprisonment for 15 years commencing 4 November 2011 and expiring 3 November 2026;
(b) On count 1 and taking into account the matters on the s 16BA Schedule, sentence the Appellant to imprisonment for 17 years and 6 months commencing 4 November 2014 and expiring 3 May 2032;
(c) The Appellant should serve a single non-parole period of 14 years and 6 months commencing 4 November 2011 and expiring 3 May 2026. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – drug importation syndicate – importing a commercial quantity of border controlled drugs – two counts on indictment with three more imports on s 16BA Schedule - whether sentencing judge erred in characterising applicant's role – discount for assistance – late offer of assistance – assessed as low to medium value – applicant's youth and dysfunctional background – whether considered - concurrency and accumulation – totality principle – all imports part of a course of offending over short period of time – whether the extent of accumulation produced a crushing sentence – error demonstrated in extent of accumulation – need to re-sentence – parity considerations Legislation Cited: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; (2013) 249 CLR 571 Engert v R (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 GJ v R [2014] NSWCCA 292 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; (2014) 252 CLR 601 Olbrich v R [1999] 199 CLR 270 R v Lachlan [2015] NSWCCA 178 R v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115; (2009) 195 A Crim R 38 Category: Principal judgment Parties: PC (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Boulten SC (Applicant) P McDonald SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate