NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: OXC Bidco Pty Ltd v Dickson [2016] NSWSC 968 Hearing dates: 7 July 2016 Decision date: 12 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Duty List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Freezing order varied Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – injunctions – freezing orders – freezing order made ex parte – whether limit of freezing order should be varied from $28.4 million to $2.25 million – assessment of likelihood of plaintiffs making out "no transaction" case – assessment of likely damages recoverable by plaintiffs Cases Cited: Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380 Frigo v Culhaci [1998] NSWCA 88 Gould v Vaggelas [1985] HCA 75; 157 CLR 215 Harris v Smith [2008] NSWSC 545 Potts v Miller (1940) 64 CLR 282 Texts Cited: P Biscoe, Freezing and Search Orders: Mareva and Anton Piller Orders, (2nd ed 2008, LexisNexis Buttterworths) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: OXC Bidco Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff) Obex (NZ) Limited (Second Plaintiff) Obex Medical Holdings Pty Ltd (Third Plaintiff) Paul Gregory Dickson (First Defendant) Dianne Dickson (Second Defendant) Fandola Investments Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I M Jackman SC with R M Foreman (Plaintiffs) M A Ashhurst SC with S B Docker (Defendants/Respondent)
Solicitors: Herbert Smith Freehills (Plaintiffs) Thomson Geer (Defendants) File Number(s): SC 2016/198984
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate