NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bidgood v R [2016] NSWCCA 138 Hearing dates: 15 June 2016 Decision date: 15 July 2016 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Davies J at [2] R S Hulme AJ at [72] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal – appeal against sentence – cultivate and supply prohibited drugs – ongoing supply – whether engaging in supply for financial reward is aggravating factor – whether applicant disentitled to the benefit of prior good character by reference to present offending – whether error in considering sentences of offenders connected to applicant but not co-offenders – re-sentence – no lesser sentence warranted Legislation Cited: Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Cases Cited: Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; (2014) 252 CLR 601 Ryan v The Queen [2001] HCA 21; (2001) 206 CLR 267 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Adrian Paul Bidgood (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I McLachlan (Applicant) P Ingram SC (Respondent)
Solicitors: P Blaxell (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/37125 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 10 April 2015 Before: English DCJ File Number(s): 2014/37125
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate