NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chow v Chow (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 994 Hearing dates: 15 July 2016 Decision date: 18 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: The parties are directed to bring in short minutes of order within 14 days to implement these reasons for judgment (having regard to par 35). Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – concerns directions to implement reasons for judgment on principal application –format of estate accounts in dispute – beneficiaries want trustees to reformat accounts from accounts prepared in accordance with current accounting standards to accounts prepared in a form suitable to be passed in probate – desirability of real issues in dispute being identified – whether beneficiaries could identify transactions of concern using accounts in current format – held court not satisfied that the annual financial statements are inadequate for the purpose of beneficiaries identifying real issues in dispute– form of short minutes of order proposed – no issue of principle Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Chow v Chow [2016] NSWSC 908 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Selwyn Sai-Him Chow (first plaintiff) Jacqueline Wai Ying Chow (second plaintiff) Evan Sai-Yiu Chow (third plaintiff) Chow Kwok Chi (fourth plaintiff)
Chow Kwork Ching (as executor of the estate of Chow Cho Poon & co-trustee of the testamentary trust of the residuary estate of Chow Cho Poon) (first defendant) Chan Pik Yun Peggy Chow (as co-trustee of the testamentary trust of the residuary estate of Chow Cho Poon) (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: PH Blackburn-Hart SC/DM Tucker M Walton SC/MW Sneddon (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate