NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tavcol Pty Ltd v Valbeet Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1002 Hearing dates: 15 July 2016 Date of orders: 21 July 2016 Decision date: 21 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: McDougall J Decision: Each party's claim for access to documents upheld with costs. Costs to be set off. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – notices of motion – both parties seeking access to claimed privileged material produced under subpoena by third parties – client legal privilege – where objection taken by legal representatives, not parties that produced the documents – whether Evidence Act or common law applies – "dominant purpose" test – whether evidence justifies the claim for privilege Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Southcorp Ltd (2003) 46 ACSR 438 Carbotech-Australia Pty Ltd v Yates [2008] NSWSC 1151 Commercial Union Assurance Company of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1997) 188 CLR 501 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49 Grant v Downs (1976) 135 CLR 674 Hancock v Rinehart (Privilege) [2016] NSWSC 12 Hartogen Energy Ltd v Australian Gas Light Co (1992) 36 FCR 557 Mitsubishi Electric Australia Pty Ltd v Victorian Workcover Authority (2002) 4 VR 332 Natuna Pty Ltd v Cook [2006] NSWSC 1367 New Cap Reinsurance Corporation Ltd (In Liq) v Renaissance Reinsurance Ltd [2007] NSWSC 258 Ryder v Frohlich [2005] NSWSC 1342 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Weston (2011) 81 NSWLR 526 State of New South Wales v Public Transport Ticketing Corporation [2011] NSWCA 60 Sydney Airports Corporation Ltd v Singapore Airlines Ltd [2005] NSWCA 47 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Tavcol Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) (2013/144338) Valbeet Pty Ltd (Defendant) Tavcol Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff) (2012/373706) Batroon Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) Simion Pty Ltd (Third Plaintiff) Valbeet Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Painter SC / R Notley (Plaintiffs) D S Weinberger / A F Knox (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate