NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Legal Services Commissioner v Miskell [2016] NSWCATOD 95 Hearing dates: 29 June 2016 Date of orders: 22 July 2016 Decision date: 22 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: S Westgarth, Deputy President D Fairlie Senior Member E Hayes, General Member Decision: (1) The respondent is guilty of professional misconduct in relation to grounds 1 and 2 of the application;
(2) The respondent is reprimanded;
(3) The respondent is to pay the costs of an incidental to the filing and hearing of the Application in the agreed sum of $2,000.00; and
(4) The Tribunal notes the respondent's undertaking to comply with the recommendations, medication and, if need be, treatment of a psychiatrist recommended by the respondent's doctor. Catchwords: Solicitor – disciplinary proceedings. Failure to comply with s 660 of the Legal Profession Act 2004. Instrument of Consent Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 2004 Legal Profession Uniform Law Act Cases Cited: Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Berwick [2016] NSWCATOD 81 New South Wales Bar Association v Breeze [2015] NSWCATOD 152 Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Butland [2009] NSWADT 177 Council of the Law Society of NSW v Autore [2012] NSWADT 139 Council of the Law Society of NSW v Beazley [2014] NSWCATOD 147 Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Tsalidis (3) [2012] NSWADT 229 Veghelyi v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales, unreported, Supreme Court 6 September 1989 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Legal Services Commissioner (Applicant) John Patrick Miskell (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Beauchamp (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate