NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CEJ v Children's Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 164 Hearing dates: 27 June 2016 Date of orders: 27 June 2016 Decision date: 27 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Mullane ADCJ, Principal member R Royer, General Member Decision: (1) The decision of the Children's Guardian of 4 September 2015 to refuse to grant the applicant a Working With Children Check Clearance is set aside. (2) In substitution for that decision the following decision is made: The applicant is granted a Working With Children Check Clearance. Catchwords: Child Protection – Working With Children – "Working With Children Check Clearance" – Appeal against refusal Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Working With Children) Act 2012; Child Protection Legislation Amendment Act 2015; Adoption Act 2000; Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997; Cases Cited: Grenfell v Director General of the Department of Finance & Services [2013] NSW ADT 57; Commission For Children and Young People –v- V [2002] NSWSC 949 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CEJ (Applicant) Children's Guardian (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Neville (Respondent)
Solicitors: W Hill (Applicant) Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondent) File Number(s): 1510585 Publication restriction: Order of 5 November 2015: Pursuant to subs 64(1)(a) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, the name of the applicant, any child (whether the person is a child now or was a child when the relevant document was created or incident occurred), any victim and the name of any person that might identify the name of the applicant, the name of a child or victim is not to be published or broadcasted without the leave of the Tribunal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate