NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Richtoll Pty Ltd v WW Lawyers (in Liquidation) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2016] NSWSC 1010 Hearing dates: 18 July 2016 Decision date: 22 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hoeben CJ at CL Decision: I make orders in accordance with the orders sought by the defendant in its notice of motion, filed 23 May 2016, and set out at par [3] hereof. I order the plaintiffs to pay the costs of this application and the hearing before me on 18 July 2016. Catchwords: COSTS – claim by successful defendant for interest on costs paid – whether evidence is required to support application for interest on costs – relevant discretionary considerations. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) – s 101 Cases Cited: Drummond and Rosen Pty Limited v Easey & Ors [No 2] [2009] NSWCA 331 Grace v Grace (No 9) [2014] NSWSC 1239 Illawarra Hotel Company Pty Ltd v Walton Construction Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 211 Joseph Lahoud & Anor v Victor Lahoud & Ors [2006] NSWSC 126 Richtoll Pty Ltd v WW Lawyers Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) [2016] NSWSC 438 Richtoll Pty Ltd v WW Lawyers Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 578 The Owners – Strata Plan No 61162 v Lipman; The Owners Strata Plan No 61162 v Building Insurer's Guarantee Corporation [2014] NSWSC 622 Category: Costs Parties: Richtoll Pty Ltd – First Plaintiff Ongoing Financial Services Pty Ltd – Second Plaintiff WW Lawyers (In Liquidation) Pty Ltd - Defendant Representation: Counsel: EWL Anderson – Plaintiffs DA Priestley SC - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate