NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Buses + 4WD Hire Pty Limited v Oz Snow Adventures Pty Limited [2016] NSWSC 1017 Hearing dates: 19 July 2016 Date of orders: 22 July 2016 Decision date: 22 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: (1) Grant leave to the first cross-defendant to have separate legal representation from those solicitors and counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiffs in the principal proceedings in order to defend the First Cross-Claim.
(2) Unless an application for a different order is made in writing to my Associate within seven days, order the plaintiffs to pay the defendants' costs of the notice of motion. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by insured plaintiff for leave for separate legal representation in order to defend the first cross-claim – legal representatives for insured plaintiff in recovery proceedings instructed by compulsory third-party insurer under Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) – cross-claim against first plaintiff – actual conflict of interest between position of first cross-defendant and its insurer would prevent legal representative acting on behalf of the first cross-defendant if also instructed by the compulsory third party insurer in the principal proceedings – order allowing separate legal representation for same party only made under exceptional circumstances – inherent jurisdiction of the Supreme Court – interests of justice favour orders – leave granted
INSURANCE – statutory insurer dominus litis in proceedings brought in insured's name for recovery of monies paid to claimants injured as a result of negligence of owner or driver – s 78 Motor Accidents Compensation Act Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56 - 60 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3, 10, 16, 78, 112 Motor Vehicles (Third Party Insurance) Act 1942 (NSW), s18 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 23 Cases Cited: Buses + 4WD Hire Pty Ltd v Oz Snow Adventures Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1687 Carter v Marine Helicopters Ltd (1996) 9 ANZ Insurance Cases 61-299 GPI Leisure v Herdsman Investments (No. 3) (1990) 20 NSWLR 15 McCann v Parsons (1954) 93 CLR 418 Rippon v Chilcotin Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 142; 53 NSWLR 198 Tindle v Ansett Transport Industries (1990) 21 NSWLR 492 Wilkins v Kingsley-Strack (unreported, Supreme Court of NSW, 12 December 1996) Texts Cited: S Mullins, "Conducting an Action on Behalf of the Insurer in the Name of the Insured (A Case for Schizophrenia)" (1991) 4 Insurance Law Journal 83 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Buses + 4WD Hire Pty Limited (1st Plaintiff, 1st Cross-Defendant) Shannon Baglee (2nd Plaintiff) Oz Snow Adventures Pty Limited (1st Defendant, 1st Cross-Claimant) Matthew Goodall (2nd Defendant, 2nd Cross-Claimant) Zurich Australia Insurance Limited (2nd Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: JA Gracie (1st & 2nd Plaintiff; 2nd Cross-Defendant) D O'Dowd (1st Cross-Defendant) J Rose (Defendants/ Cross-Claimants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate