NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Augustus v Mohammed (No.2) [2016] NSWCATAP 165 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 26 July 2016 Decision date: 26 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: P Callaghan SC, Principal Member S Thode, Senior Member Decision: The appellants are to pay the respondents' costs of this appeal as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: APPEAL – Civil and Administrative Tribunal – costs – special circumstances – no case for indemnity costs Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 Cases Cited: eMove Pty Ltd v Dickinson [2015] NSWCATAP 94 Huntsman Chemical Co Australia Ltd v International Pools Australia Ltd (1985) 36 NSWLR 242 Texts Cited: Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure NSW Category: Costs Parties: Appellants: Viji Augustus, Sylvia Shanthi Augustus, Roshan Iyadurai, Rebecca Roshan, Stanley James and Aravinda Stanley
Respondents: Abdul Kaheel Mohammed and Shahim Mothi Sheikh Representation: Appellants: in person
Respondents: J Antoun, Solicitor of Uther Webster & Evans
Solicitors: File Number(s): AP 15/60640 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: Nil Date of Decision: 22 September 2015 Before: J A Ringrose, General Member File Number(s): HB 14/61603
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate