NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: APV v Department of Finance and Services [2016] NSWCATAD 168 Hearing dates: 18 April 2016 Date of orders: 27 July 2016 Decision date: 27 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: N Isenberg, Senior Member Decision: (1) Pursuant to section 55(2)(a) of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 , the Respondent is to pay to the Applicant damages of $5,000.
(2) Each party is to pay its own costs Catchwords: Breach of privacy – damages – loss of opportunity – onus on Applicant – nexus between claimed loss and breach Legislation Cited: Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: APV and APW and Department of Finance and Services [2014] NSWCATAD 10 Office of Finance and Services v APV and APW [2014] NSWCATAP 88 BVS v Sydney Local Health District [2015] NSWCATAD 171 GR v Director-General, Department of Housing [2004] NSWADTAP 26 WT v Auburn Council [2007] NSWADT 253 NW v NSW Fire Brigade (No.2) [2006] NSWADT 61 NZ v Director General Department of Housing [2006] NSWADT 173 GR v Department of Housing (No.2) [2005] NSWADT 301 RD v Department of Education and Training [2005] NSWADT 195 Re Rummery & The Federal Privacy Commissioner & Anor [2004] AATA 1221 FM v Macquarie University [2003] NSWADT 78 NK v Northern Sydney Central Coast Area Health Service (No.2) [2011] NSWADT 81 Tabet v Gett [2010] HCA 12 Category: Principal judgment Parties: APV (First Applicant) APW (Second Applicant) Department of Finance and Services (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H Pintos-Lopez (Applicants) J Davidson (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate