NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hopoate v National Rugby League Limited [2016] NSWSC 1029 Hearing dates: 1 July 2016 Date of orders: 26 July 2016 Decision date: 26 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: See par 37 Catchwords: COSTS – discontinuance of proceedings – application for alternative cost order made by plaintiff under UCPR r 42.19(2) – whether plaintiff should pay defendant's costs – consideration of circumstances of discontinuance – held reasonable commencement of proceedings – held plaintiff failed to achieve practical success by the commencement of proceedings – held no unreasonable conduct by the defendant – application for alternative cost order not made out – plaintiff to pay defendant's costs of the proceedings and the notice of motion Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australiawide Airlines Limited v Aspirion Pty Limited [2006] NSWCA 365 Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission [1992] HCA 10; 175 CLR 564 Bitannia Pty Ltd v Parkline Constructions Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 32 CGU Insurance Limited v Blakeley [2016] HCA 2 Fordyce v Fordham [2006] NSWCA 274 Mao v Yehuaxin Enterprise Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 1270 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (Cth); Ex Parte Lai Qin [1997] HCA 6; 186 CLR 622 Category: Costs Parties: John Hopoate (plaintiff) National Rugby League Limited (defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Smith (plaintiff) S Kanagaratnam (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate