NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AF v R [2016] NSWCCA 180 Hearing dates: 15 February 2016 Date of orders: 19 August 2016 Decision date: 19 August 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL [1] Fullerton J [2] RS Hulme AJ [3] Decision: (i) Appeal Allowed. (ii) Quash the conviction of the Applicant that occurred on 14 June 2013 and the sentence imposed by McClintock SC DCJ on 9 May 2014. (iii) Order that there be a new trial. Catchwords: Criminal law – no evidence from accused – failure to give Azzopardi direction – accused old and non-parole period served but acquittal not appropriate Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Appeal Rules 1996 Cases Cited: Azzopardi v The Queen [2001] HCA 25, 205 CLR 50 Burke v The Queen [2013] VSCA 351 Giotas v R [2006] NSWCCA 358 Glennon v The Queen (1993) 179 CLR 1 Johnston v R [2007] NSWCA 133 Papakosmas v R [1999] HCA 37; 196 CLR 297 R v Bevin [2008] QCA 310 R v Burns [2003] NSWCCA 30; 137 A Crim R 557 R v Colville [2003] NSWCCA 23; 137 A Crim R 543 R v GAJ [2011] QCA 141 R v Graham [2005] NSWCCA 127 R v Macris [2004] NSWCCA 261 R v Richards [2002] NSWCCA 38; 128 A Crim R 204 R v SMR [2002] NSWCCA 258 R v Wilson [2005] NSWCCA 20 Sever v R [2007] NSWCCA 339 X7 v Australian Crime Commission at [2013] HCA 29; 248 CLR 92 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina AF Representation: Counsel: Mr H Baker (Crown) Mr W Hunt with Mr T Ramrakha (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate