NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Jurox Pty Ltd v Fullick [2016] NSWCA 180 Hearing dates: 28 October 2015 Decision date: 29 July 2016 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Simpson JA at [22]; Rothman J at [120] Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed;
(2) Appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: TORTS – negligence – personal injury – respondent injured while working at premises occupied by appellant and at direction of appellant – respondent not employed by appellant – system of work not unsafe – failure by respondent to work in accordance with system as designed – failure of appellant to supervise implementation of system – breach of duty – whether primary judge failed to make findings of fact regarding appellant's breach of duty – Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A(6) – inadequacy of supervision – no formalised system of supervision
TORTS – negligence – causation – Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 5D – risk of harm to respondent from lifting bags of dextrose was foreseeable and not insignificant – harm could have been avoided through adequate supervision
TORTS – negligence – contributory negligence – failure of primary judge to address plea of contributory negligence – power of Court of Appeal to determine plea of contributory negligence – Najdovski v Crnojlovic [2008] NSWCA 175; 72 NSWLR 728 – respondent not liable in contributory negligence
WORKERS COMPENSATION – joint tortfeasors – Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), s 151Z(2) – whether s 151Z(2) applied – respondent's employer not a joint tortfeasor – appellant not entitled to reduction under s 151Z(2)(c) – appeal against liability dismissed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate