NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Christina Elizabeth Hay v Sarah Renwick [2016] NSWSC 1048 Hearing dates: Tuesday, 26 April 2016 Date of orders: 27 April 2016 Decision date: 27 April 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Brereton J Decision: Plaintiff, de facto spouse of deceased, to receive legacy of $1.5 million from estate Catchwords: SUCCESSION – family provision and maintenance – application by de facto spouse of short but on-going relationship – where relationship was relatively short but plainly committed to a shared future – dependency for accommodation and financial and material support – significant changes made in plaintiff's position in reliance upon relationship – testamentary intentions of the deceased in will of limited significance where there are supervening changes of circumstances Legislation Cited: (NSW) Family Provision Act 1982 Probate and Administration Act 1898, s 84A Cases Cited: Andrew v Andrew [2012] 81 NSWLR 656 Court v Hunt, 29 October 1987, unreported Elliott v Elliott, 18 May 1984, unreported Gorton v Parks (1989) 17 NSWLR 1 Luciano v Rosenblum [1985] 2 NSWLR 65 Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales (1962) 107 CLR 9 Re Fulop Deceased (1987) 8 NSWLR 679 Singer v Berghouse (No 2) (1994) 181 CLR 201 Vigolo v Bostin [2005] CLR 191 Golosky v Golosky [1993] NSWCA 111 Stewart v McDougall NSWSC, 19 November 198, unreported Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christina Elizabeth Hay (plaintiff) Sarah Renwick (first defendant) Robert Maidment (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: C A Vindin (plaintiff) G A Sirtes SC w NCT Bilinsky (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate